A European Union court ruled Thursday that social networking sites
cannot be compelled to install general filters to prevent the illegal
trading of music and other copyrighted material.
The decision is a victory for operators of social networking sites in
the EU, but a setback for those who seek to protect copyrighted material
from being distributed without payment or permission.
It also comes as protests are growing in Europe against ACTA, the
proposed international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, which is
meant to protect intellectual property rights.
In Thursday's decision, the EU Court of Justice, which is based in
Luxembourg, ruled that requiring general filters that would cover all
the site's users would not sufficiently protect personal data or the
freedom to receive and impart information.
SABAM, a Belgian company that represents authors, composers and music
publishers, filed the lawsuit leading to Thursday's ruling. In it, the
company objected to the practices of Netlog NV, a social networking
site, saying users' profiles allowed protected works to be shared
illegally.
Michael Gardner, head of the intellectual property practice at London
law firm Wedlake Bell, called the ruling a further blow to copyright
owners because it appears to rule out forcing operators of social
network sites and Internet service providers — at their own expense — to
impose blanket monitoring and filtering aimed at stopping
infringements.
No comments:
Post a Comment